Chaotic MS Paint Sticker Set — Sora 2 Prompt

Task Objective:
Generate a set of 16 chat-style sticker emojis based on the reference images. The result should feel expressive, highly shareable, and stylistically unified — but intentionally chaotic, low-quality, and humorous. The final output should look like:
Someone who cannot draw, using a mouse in MS Paint, randomly doodling and writing text at the same time — messy, awkward, low-effort, but unexpectedly funny. ————————
Input Structure: Image 1: Character reference (may include one or multiple subjects such as people, pets, or combinations)
Image 2: Layout reference (only for understanding the 4x4 grid structure, not style) User Inputs:
- Text content (multiple lines, any language, may be fewer or more than 16) ————————
Character Usage Rules: - Identify all possible subjects in Image 1 (people, animals, etc.)
- Each subject can act as a main character
- Different stickers can feature different characters
- Some stickers may include multiple characters interacting
- Distribution should feel natural and context-driven ————————
Consistency Definition (Critical Redefinition): This task prioritizes “consistent imperfection”, NOT realistic consistency. The same character across stickers:
Does NOT need to look identical,
but must feel like it was drawn by the same unskilled person. Must be consistent in:
- Drawing behavior (same clumsy hand)
- Simplification logic
- Error patterns (crooked proportions, shaky lines)
- Overall messiness level Allowed:
- Facial distortion
- Proportion inconsistency
- Structural errors
- Missing details Must retain:
- Minimal recognizable traits (e.g. silhouette, color, signature features) Summary:
Consistency = “wrong in the same way”, not “accurate likeness” ————————
Layout & Structure: - 16 stickers total, arranged in a 4x4 grid
- Each sticker is an independent frame
- Can feature single or multiple characters
- Individual frames can be messy
- Overall grid must remain clear and readable ————————
Text System (Core Expression Layer): User provides multiple lines of text: Quantity Handling:
- If fewer than 16 → automatically complete to 16
- If more than 16 → select the most expressive 16 Language Rule:
- Use the same language as the user input
- Do NOT enforce any specific language Completion Rules:
- Maintain tone consistency (sarcastic, lazy, emotional, clingy, absurd, etc.)
- Prefer internet-style expressions
- Short phrases preferred, but longer lines allowed
- Avoid repetition Expression Goals:
- Instantly understandable
- Emotionally strong
- Feels like real meme text Tone Priority:
- Complaints
- Self-talk
- Emotional bursts
- Indifference / annoyance / absurd humor Avoid:
- Polite responses
- Formal or structured phrasing ————————
Text-Image Integration (Critical): Text must be DRAWN, not typeset. Must:
- Look like mouse handwriting (crooked, shaky, uneven size)
- Be messy (tilted, overlapping, misaligned)
- Have inconsistent spacing
- Be placed freely (on face, beside, edges, etc.) Allowed:
- Repeated letters (aaaaa)
- Stretched words (soooo tired)
- Random punctuation (????!!!)
- Messy or ugly writing Must:
- Remain readable
- Not block understanding ————————
Expression Generation Mechanism (Most Important): Simulate this process: “A person who cannot draw, using a mouse, doodling randomly while writing text at the same time.” Key Rules:
- Image and text must come from the SAME moment
- Not: draw first, then add text
- But: draw and write simultaneously Each sticker should feel like:
- Random doodle
- Then spontaneous writing
- Or both happening together Should feel:
- Unplanned
- Careless
- Immediate ————————
Text-Image Relationship: Text and visuals should form:
- Commentary
- Emotional amplification
- Self-talk
- Or slightly mismatched humor Allowed:
- Loose or imperfect alignment
- Absurd or off-topic humor Goal:
Not accuracy, but humor ————————
Aesthetic DNA (Core Style Driver): Style origin:
Terrible MS Paint doodles + failed imitation + extremely low drawing skill Visual Traits: Lines:
- Shaky, unstable, jagged
- Mouse-drawn look Forms:
- Bad proportions
- Stick figures or crude shapes
- Distorted structures Details:
- Minimal or none
- “Cannot draw” feeling Texture:
- Pixelated
- Rough edges Composition:
- Frames can be messy
- Grid must stay readable Emotion:
- Awkward, direct, absurd, funny Resemblance:
- Only vaguely resembles the original
- Like a failed copy ————————
Style Enforcement (Critical): When conflict occurs: Realism vs Style → ALWAYS choose Style Allowed to break:
- Detail
- Proportion
- Accuracy
- Cleanliness Strictly forbid:
- Clean lines
- Correct anatomy
- Polished visuals
- Designed aesthetics Rule:
If it looks “good”, it is WRONG. Force it back to messy, ugly, low-effort. ————————
Anti-Template & Randomization System (Critical): Strictly forbid:
- Numbering (1, 2, 3…)
- List-style output
- Sequential planning Must treat all 16 stickers as:
“16 independent, random expressions” Randomness Requirements: - Vary text length
- Vary tone and emotion
- Some complete, some fragmented
- Some minimal or almost empty Avoid:
- Repetition
- Predictable phrasing
- Common default responses Allow:
- Abrupt or weird expressions
- Uneven density
- Inconsistent structure Generation Method: Do NOT plan all 16. Instead simulate:
“16 separate spontaneous moments” Must include:
- Emotional fluctuation
- Instability
- Randomness Anti-reuse rule: Each generation must:
- Avoid repeating previous outputs
- Avoid fixed patterns
- Feel freshly created ————————
Sticker Requirements: - Each sticker visually distinct
- Clear emotional signal
- Usable in chat
- Strong expressive power ————————
Final Goal: Generate 16 stickers. The result must feel like: “A person who cannot draw used a mouse to doodle 16 times,
randomly writing emotional thoughts each time —
messy, inconsistent, but unexpectedly funny.” NOT: “A clean, well-designed AI sticker set”